<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How long can a text link be if it should improve your rankings?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.w7b.org/keyword/maximum-keyword-length.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.w7b.org/keyword/maximum-keyword-length.html</link>
	<description>A simple Blog to help you making money online.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joomla Expert</title>
		<link>http://www.w7b.org/keyword/maximum-keyword-length.html/comment-page-1#comment-2234</link>
		<dc:creator>Joomla Expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.w7b.org/?p=298#comment-2234</guid>
		<description>Nice information, and you have suggested well. Your recommendation are reliable and adoptable. But I think Google consider 66 characters for title, 150 characters for description and about 10 keywords for keyword length.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice information, and you have suggested well. Your recommendation are reliable and adoptable. But I think Google consider 66 characters for title, 150 characters for description and about 10 keywords for keyword length.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunita Biddu</title>
		<link>http://www.w7b.org/keyword/maximum-keyword-length.html/comment-page-1#comment-2145</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunita Biddu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.w7b.org/?p=298#comment-2145</guid>
		<description>Indeed agreed. Good test Abhi. You could include the point of timeduration as well though.. to achieve rankings. Like how long it may take the link to contribute to rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed agreed. Good test Abhi. You could include the point of timeduration as well though.. to achieve rankings. Like how long it may take the link to contribute to rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
